Week 1: Dialogue
Your original posts (300 words minimum) should answer the following question.
People sometimes suggest that psychology cannot be a science because either (a) human behavior cannot be predicted with perfect accuracy or (b) much of its subject matter (e.g. thoughts and feelings) cannot be observed directly. Explain why you might agree or disagree with these statements. Submit your original and response Discussion Posts in the Dialogue under the Week 1 forum.
Week 1 Discussion: Dialogue
Psychology is a science because it uses a scientific methodology. The method used in a study determines its scientific legitimacy, not the research it investigates, not when it was completed, and most definitely not who initiated it. Analytical techniques are used across many professions. Empiricism highlights the accuracy and objectives of calculation.
If psychologists provide actual data, they can declare psychology and other behavioral or social sciences (sociology, anthropology, economics, and politics) to be scientific.
However, these measures are not as accurate as those used in biology, chemistry, or physics. Due to this emphasis on the empirically quantifiable, psychology has to change the notion of the science of action from the study of thought (because the mind itself could not be explicitly observed).
We may keep an eye on and assess outside variables like what someone does, says, or how they do on a psychological exam. One’s ideas are not instantly visible to us (e.g., inner thoughts, emotions). Detailed study of the world can provide answers to questions about how it truly is.
There is empirical disagreement on the topic of whether women speak more than men. The degree of genuine communication between men and women may be evaluated empirically since people either talk or they don’t. Science is unable to provide answers to many significant and exciting problems because they cannot be empirically proven.
Some of them have to do with moral principles, such as what is right or wrong, fair or unfair, beautiful or unpleasant, and how the world should be. Therefore, even if the topic of whether a heterogeneous is accurate or inaccurate may be resolved by experimental testing, it is unsuitable for humans to have an erroneous heterogenesis.
The question of whether there is a genetic component to crime can only be answered experimentally; it has nothing to do with the offenders’ skills. This is similar to the preceding statement.
Teo, T. (2020). Theorizing in psychology: From the critique of a hyper-science to conceptualizing subjectivity. Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 759-767.