Question: Post a 1-2 paragraph reading reaction to Hannah Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy by Wednesday, March 30th at midnight.
Hannah Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy
Hannah Arendt in his last philosophical note has an intention to disclose the result of Kant’s Political Philosophy, where Hannah gives out a glimpse of ideas related prior to acknowledging the intention to create an idea and to talk about the inquiry about Kant’s political philosophy with difficulties. Arendt mainly mentioned that compared to other philosophers like Plato, Aristotle, Hegel, and others have never written political philosophy like that. Hence, Arendt, unfortunately, tries to disclose the theory while discussing “Thinking and Willing”, while she mentioned, “Judging”, while Hannah Arendt narrates Life of the Mind, which is a posthumous work. In the case of her analysis, where she mentioned the theory that “Critique of Judgement”, mainly enables to breakdown of some of the antinomies to resolve the perplexities to think and learn about the will to ponder upon nature and its capacity of judging. Apart from this, the topics are actually not concerned with Kant’s philosophy that does not deal with judgment to learn about the nature of the topic (Ronald p. 7-10). Kant states about history can be evaluated from the nature of the human species so that they are insofar or belongs to be an animal on the Earth. As a result, in “Critique of Judgment” to learn about the fact of nature or about the event in the historical context, with a faculty of judgment to learn about a man’s mind with sociability among men, while learning insight of men to learn the body and their physical needs to learn the mental faculties with an eminent political significance. Thus, she conceived of her works as it has a rough link with the “Critiques of Judgement” by Immanuel Kant. Based on the explanation, Arendt mainly focuses on the idea of stating the fact on the political philosophy where Kant has written about the “The Critique of Judgment”, based on the keystone and his politics. Alternatively, the doctrinal part was mainly focused on Hannah’s sayings, which contain “the metaphysics of nature and of morals”, which is the very first indication made perhaps, continues to gather notes on “Critique of Judgement”, as this is related with the American Revolution, that was interested in Kant (Ronald p. 16). However, she argues Kant’s point of view about the world based on the three distinctive points on the peculiar concept of the role and learning about the activity for the faculty and judgment to maintain the role and while learning about the activity about the faculty of judgment based on a concept that is deemed to come forth with the terms of politics.
The second session was mainly projected on the element of Kant’s writings which cannot be traced to the precritical period. As this appeared after the 1790s, the span when Critique of Judgement, which was generally written after the French Revolution. Apart from this, the philosophy of Kant has centered around human sociability, which is recognized as present-day politics and is organized based on the Constitutional laws of recent times. Hence, the main concept of the “Republicans”, is the recent Constitutional government creating an International Relationship. This theory mainly focuses on the analysis stating the fact where Kant narrates about the bad man, which is man’s evil, that is analyzed to be the “race of devils”, The project from the lecture of Hannah Arendt on the Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy reflects and traces the motivational aspect that actually criticizes Arendt’s interpretation and judgment of Kant’s Critique of Judgement (Ronald, p.26). While gives a description of this ideology of Kant’s analysis, which mainly evolves through the criteria stating the central concept which is where Kant gives analysis about the judgment of beauty. Thus, he eventually calls it “free play”, which actually deals with monitoring one’s cognitive power which is based on imagination as well as learning about understanding. Therefore, as well as all call it an object, because this often fits the cognitive power, as lectured by Immanuel Kant, where “free play”, experiences the pleasure that we often acquire.
Comparatively, the complicated matters based on Arendt actually talk about Kant to guide her with the faculties of Judgement to set some ideas, where he could not live to develop it. Thus, Hannah Arendt’s theory of judgment is likely to be the foundation of Kant’s Political Philosophy (Ronald p. 89-90). Moreover, Arendt’s theory mainly involves the philosophical ideas where Plato impugned dignity and the polis regarding Hegel’s learning system as the foundation to get an idea about modern historicism. In this context, Kant’s lecture is projected toward the completion of the enactment of the public deeds that presuppose the company while judging the spectacle conception with a precise note. Thus, this is related to Arendt’s judgment to appreciate his theoretical impulse on the side of his Critique to judgment based on the aesthetic judgment, his dialogues, and the communicative style. Apart from this, Hannah eventually deals with the ideas, which is described by Kant, on complex cognition, which directly refers to the intuitions, predictions as well as exemplifications of the logical concepts that claim Universal validity. Thus, it can be concluded that Hannah Arendt retraces the ideas of Kant and his philosophy on the political insight of men to construct Hannah Arendt’s theory of Judgement.
Reference
Ronald Beiner (1992). Hannah Arendt, Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy. The University of Chicago Press.
